From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] 3/7 consolidate single_lun code
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:02:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030324180247.B15047@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030324180227.A15047@beaverton.ibm.com>; from patmans@us.ibm.com on Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:02:27PM -0800
Consolidate scsi single_lun code.
diff -purN -X /home/patman/dontdiff put_cmd-25/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c lun-single-25/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- put_cmd-25/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Mon Mar 24 12:14:51 2003
+++ lun-single-25/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Mon Mar 24 12:14:55 2003
@@ -323,6 +323,49 @@ void scsi_setup_cmd_retry(struct scsi_cm
}
/*
+ * Called for single_lun devices. The target associated with current_sdev can
+ * only handle one active command at a time. Scan through all of the luns
+ * on the same target as current_sdev, return 1 if any are active.
+ */
+static int scsi_single_lun_check(struct scsi_device *current_sdev)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(sdev, ¤t_sdev->same_target_siblings,
+ same_target_siblings)
+ if (sdev->device_busy)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Called for single_lun devices on IO completion. If no requests
+ * outstanding for current_sdev, call __blk_run_queue for the next
+ * scsi_device on the same target that has requests.
+ *
+ * Called with queue_lock held.
+ */
+static void scsi_single_lun_run(struct scsi_device *current_sdev,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev;
+ struct Scsi_Host *shost;
+
+ shost = current_sdev->host;
+ if (blk_queue_empty(q) && current_sdev->device_busy == 0 &&
+ !shost->host_blocked && !shost->host_self_blocked &&
+ !((shost->can_queue > 0) &&
+ (shost->host_busy >= shost->can_queue)))
+ list_for_each_entry(sdev, ¤t_sdev->same_target_siblings,
+ same_target_siblings)
+ if (!sdev->device_blocked &&
+ !blk_queue_empty(sdev->request_queue)) {
+ __blk_run_queue(sdev->request_queue);
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
* Function: scsi_queue_next_request()
*
* Purpose: Handle post-processing of completed commands.
@@ -390,29 +433,11 @@ void scsi_queue_next_request(request_que
}
sdev = q->queuedata;
- shost = sdev->host;
- /*
- * If this is a single-lun device, and we are currently finished
- * with this device, then see if we need to get another device
- * started. FIXME(eric) - if this function gets too cluttered
- * with special case code, then spin off separate versions and
- * use function pointers to pick the right one.
- */
- if (sdev->single_lun && blk_queue_empty(q) && sdev->device_busy ==0 &&
- !shost->host_blocked && !shost->host_self_blocked &&
- !((shost->can_queue > 0) && (shost->host_busy >=
- shost->can_queue))) {
- list_for_each_entry(sdev2, &sdev->same_target_siblings,
- same_target_siblings) {
- if (!sdev2->device_blocked &&
- !blk_queue_empty(sdev2->request_queue)) {
- __blk_run_queue(sdev2->request_queue);
- break;
- }
- }
- }
+ if (sdev->single_lun)
+ scsi_single_lun_run(sdev, q);
+ shost = sdev->host;
while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) &&
!shost->host_blocked && !shost->host_self_blocked &&
!((shost->can_queue > 0) &&
@@ -917,22 +942,6 @@ static int scsi_init_io(struct scsi_cmnd
return BLKPREP_KILL;
}
-/*
- * The target associated with myself can only handle one active command at
- * a time. Scan through all of the luns on the same target as myself,
- * return 1 if any are active.
- */
-static int check_all_luns(struct scsi_device *myself)
-{
- struct scsi_device *sdev;
-
- list_for_each_entry(sdev, &myself->same_target_siblings,
- same_target_siblings)
- if (sdev->device_busy)
- return 1;
- return 0;
-}
-
static int scsi_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
{
struct Scsi_Device_Template *sdt;
@@ -1077,9 +1086,6 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(request_queu
if (sdev->device_busy >= sdev->queue_depth)
break;
- if (sdev->single_lun && check_all_luns(sdev))
- break;
-
if (shost->host_busy == 0 && shost->host_blocked) {
/* unblock after host_blocked iterates to zero */
if (--shost->host_blocked == 0) {
@@ -1120,6 +1126,9 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(request_queu
break;
}
+ if (sdev->single_lun && scsi_single_lun_check(sdev))
+ break;
+
/*
* If we couldn't find a request that could be queued, then we
* can also quit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-25 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-25 1:53 [PATCH] 0/7 per scsi_device queue lock patches Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 1:54 ` [PATCH] 1/7 starved changes - use a list_head for starved queue's Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 2:02 ` [PATCH] 2/7 add missing scsi_queue_next_request calls Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 2:02 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-03-25 2:03 ` [PATCH] 4/7 cleanup/consolidate code in scsi_request_fn Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 2:03 ` [PATCH] 5/7 alloc a request_queue on each scsi_alloc_sdev call Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 2:03 ` [PATCH] 6/7 add and use a per-scsi_device queue_lock Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 2:04 ` [PATCH] 7/7 fix single_lun code for " Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 21:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 21:47 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 22:12 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 21:03 ` [PATCH] 6/7 add and use a " Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 21:33 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 21:20 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-26 2:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-27 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-28 0:30 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 7:12 ` [PATCH] 5/7 alloc a request_queue on each scsi_alloc_sdev call Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-25 7:18 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 21:32 ` [PATCH] 4/7 cleanup/consolidate code in scsi_request_fn Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 0:58 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 17:07 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 17:13 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 17:25 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 20:36 ` [PATCH] 3/7 consolidate single_lun code Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 19:11 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 22:05 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-27 22:43 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-28 15:09 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-28 20:06 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 20:50 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 19:41 ` [PATCH] 2/7 add missing scsi_queue_next_request calls Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 19:39 ` [PATCH] 1/7 starved changes - use a list_head for starved queue's Luben Tuikov
2003-03-27 16:14 ` [PATCH] 0/7 per scsi_device queue lock patches James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030324180247.B15047@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox