From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
dougg@torque.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch for playing] 2.5.65 patch to support > 256 disks
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:18:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030327091854.GY30908@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303261629.34868.pbadari@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, Mar 26 2003, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 04:35 am, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > Only testing will tell, so yes you are very welcome to give it a shot.
> > Let me release a known working version first :)
>
> Jens,
>
> I found whats using 32MB out of 8192-byte slab.
>
> size-8192 before:10 after:4012 diff:4002 size:8192 incr:32784384
>
> It is deadline_init():
>
> dd->hash = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head)*DL_HASH_ENTRIES,GFP_KERNEL);
>
> It is creating 8K hash table for each queue. Since we have 4000 queues,
Yes
> it used 32MB. I wonder why the current code needs 1024 hash buckets,
Hmm actually that's a leftover from when we played with bigger queue
sizes, I inadvertently forgot to change it back when pushing the rbtree
deadline update to Linus. It used to be 256. We can shrink this to 2^7
or 2^8 instead, which will then only eat 1-2K.
> when maximum requests are only 256. And also, since you are making
> request allocation dynamic, can you change this too ? Any issues here ?
No real issues to shrinking it, bigger problem if we move to larger
queues. With the rq-dyn-alloc patch, we can make the max number of
requests ceiling a lot higher and then the hash needs to be bigger too.
But for now, 256 entry should be a good default and suffice for the
future, I'll push that change.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-27 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-21 18:56 [patch for playing] 2.5.65 patch to support > 256 disks Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-22 11:00 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-22 11:04 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-22 11:46 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-22 12:05 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-24 21:32 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-24 22:22 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-24 22:54 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-25 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-24 22:57 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-25 10:56 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 11:39 ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-25 12:01 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 12:12 ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-25 12:35 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-27 0:29 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-27 9:18 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-03-28 17:04 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-03-28 18:41 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-03-29 1:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030327091854.GY30908@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox