From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] 2/5 scsi-locking-2.5 remove lock hierarchy
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:47:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030409164701.B23701@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030409164612.A23701@beaverton.ibm.com>; from patmans@us.ibm.com on Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:46:12PM -0700
Get rid of the lock hierarchy for queue_lock and host_lock (even for the
single_lun case).
diff -purN -X /home/patman/dontdiff 01_slun_mod/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 02_no_hier/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- 01_slun_mod/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Wed Apr 9 12:39:15 2003
+++ 02_no_hier/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Wed Apr 9 12:39:20 2003
@@ -1088,9 +1088,10 @@ static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(s
/*
* scsi_host_queue_ready: if we can send requests to shost, return 1 else
- * return 0.
+ * return 0. We must end up running the queue again whenever 0 is
+ * returned, else IO can hang.
*
- * Called with queue_lock and host_lock held.
+ * Called with host_lock held.
*/
static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
struct Scsi_Host *shost,
@@ -1157,41 +1158,54 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(request_queu
if (blk_queue_plugged(q))
goto completed;
+ if (blk_queue_empty(q))
+ goto completed;
+
/*
* get next queueable request. We do this early to make sure
* that the request is fully prepared even if we cannot
- * accept it. If there is no request, we'll detect this
- * lower down.
+ * accept it.
*/
req = elv_next_request(q);
- if (!scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev))
+ if (!req) {
+ /*
+ * If the device is busy, a returning I/O will
+ * restart the queue. Otherwise, we have to plug
+ * the queue
+ */
+ if (sdev->device_busy == 0)
+ blk_plug_device(q);
goto completed;
+ }
- spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- if (!scsi_host_queue_ready(q, shost, sdev))
- goto after_host_lock;
-
- if (sdev->single_lun && sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user &&
- (sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user != sdev))
- goto after_host_lock;
+ if (!scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev))
+ goto completed;
/*
- * If we couldn't find a request that could be queued, then we
- * can also quit.
+ * Remove the request from the request list.
*/
- if (blk_queue_empty(q))
- goto after_host_lock;
+ if (!(blk_queue_tagged(q) && (blk_queue_start_tag(q, req) == 0)))
+ blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
- if (!req) {
- /* If the device is busy, a returning I/O
- * will restart the queue. Otherwise, we have
- * to plug the queue */
- if (sdev->device_busy == 1)
- blk_plug_device(q);
- goto after_host_lock;
+ sdev->device_busy++;
+ spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
+ if (!scsi_host_queue_ready(q, shost, sdev))
+ goto host_lock_held;
+
+ if (sdev->single_lun) {
+ if (sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user &&
+ (sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user != sdev))
+ goto host_lock_held;
+ else
+ sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user = sdev;
}
+ shost->host_busy++;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
+
cmd = req->special;
/*
@@ -1201,26 +1215,6 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(request_queu
BUG_ON(!cmd);
/*
- * Finally, before we release the lock, we copy the
- * request to the command block, and remove the
- * request from the request list. Note that we always
- * operate on the queue head - there is absolutely no
- * reason to search the list, because all of the
- * commands in this queue are for the same device.
- */
- if (!(blk_queue_tagged(q) && (blk_queue_start_tag(q, req) == 0)))
- blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
-
- if (sdev->single_lun)
- sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user = sdev;
-
- shost->host_busy++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
-
- sdev->device_busy++;
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
-
- /*
* Finally, initialize any error handling parameters, and set up
* the timers for timeouts.
*/
@@ -1240,8 +1234,21 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(request_queu
completed:
return;
-after_host_lock:
+host_lock_held:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * lock q, handle tag, requeue req, and decrement device_busy. We
+ * must return with queue_lock held.
+ *
+ * Decrementing device_busy without checking it is OK, as all such
+ * cases (host limits or settings) should run the queue at some
+ * later time.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ if (blk_rq_tagged(req))
+ blk_queue_end_tag(q, req);
+ __elv_add_request(q, req, 0, 0);
+ sdev->device_busy--;
}
u64 scsi_calculate_bounce_limit(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-09 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-09 23:46 [patch] 1/5 scsi-locking-2.5 single_lun store scsi_device pointer Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-09 23:47 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-04-09 23:47 ` [patch] 3/5 scsi-locking-2.5 prevent looping when processing starved queues Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-09 23:47 ` [patch] 4/5 scsi-locking-2.5 list_del starved_entry plus use GFP_ATOMIC Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-09 23:48 ` [patch] 5/5 scsi-locking-2.5 remove extra sdev2, remove extra logging Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030409164701.B23701@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox