From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill two scsi ioctls
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:26:33 +0100
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20030410182633.GE96127@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
References: <UTC200304101729.h3AHTB426607.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:787 "EHLO
	serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264150AbTDJSO4 (for <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:14:56 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <UTC200304101729.h3AHTB426607.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:29:11PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> It happens all the time. Hundreds of cases.

That's obviously no excuse.

> historical explanations somewhere else, for example in
> Documentation/ioctl_list.

Fine by me.

regards
john