From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_requeuest_fn
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:04:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030427170440.A29493@lst.de> (raw)
Okay, when doing some other stuff I looked over this one, and it's
a bit confusing to read:
- using a goto completed where a simple break would be sufficient
- using for (;;) for a perfectly fine while loop
- ...
but what's more interesting is that the spinlock handling in here,
when we switch from sdev_lock/queue_lock to host_lock we
do a spin_unlock_irq followed by a spin_lock_irqsave - but we
we just enabled interrupts so the save isn't nessecary at all, even
more we can just do spin_unlock/spin_lock when keeping them
disabled. Also we drop host_lock in the middle of this function,
just to reacquire it a tad later in scsi_dispatch_cmd, but fixing
that need a bit more thinking as there's another caller for
scsi_dispatch_cmd.
--- 1.84/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Mon Apr 21 10:17:33 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Sun Apr 27 14:19:35 2003
@@ -1140,66 +1128,61 @@
*
* Lock status: IO request lock assumed to be held when called.
*/
-static void scsi_request_fn(request_queue_t *q)
+static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
{
struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
struct request *req;
- unsigned long flags;
/*
* To start with, we keep looping until the queue is empty, or until
* the host is no longer able to accept any more requests.
*/
- for (;;) {
- if (blk_queue_plugged(q))
- goto completed;
-
+ while (!blk_queue_plugged(q)) {
/*
* get next queueable request. We do this early to make sure
* that the request is fully prepared even if we cannot
* accept it.
*/
req = elv_next_request(q);
-
- if (!req)
- goto completed;
-
- if (!scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev))
- goto completed;
+ if (!req || !scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev))
+ break;
/*
* Remove the request from the request list.
*/
- if (!(blk_queue_tagged(q) && (blk_queue_start_tag(q, req) == 0)))
+ if (!(blk_queue_tagged(q) && !blk_queue_start_tag(q, req)))
blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
-
sdev->device_busy++;
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- if (!scsi_host_queue_ready(q, shost, sdev))
- goto host_lock_held;
+ spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
+ spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
+ if (!scsi_host_queue_ready(q, shost, sdev))
+ goto not_ready;
if (sdev->single_lun) {
if (sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user &&
- (sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user != sdev))
- goto host_lock_held;
- else
- sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user = sdev;
+ sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user != sdev)
+ goto not_ready;
+ sdev->sdev_target->starget_sdev_user = sdev;
}
-
shost->host_busy++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
-
- cmd = req->special;
/*
- * Should be impossible for a correctly prepared request
- * please mail the stack trace to linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
+ * XXX(hch): This is rather suboptimal, scsi_dispatch_cmd will
+ * take the lock again.
*/
- BUG_ON(!cmd);
+ spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+
+ cmd = req->special;
+ if (unlikely(cmd == NULL)) {
+ printk(KERN_CRIT "impossible request in %s.\n"
+ "please mail a stack trace to "
+ "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org",
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ BUG();
+ }
/*
* Finally, initialize any error handling parameters, and set up
@@ -1211,18 +1194,14 @@
* Dispatch the command to the low-level driver.
*/
scsi_dispatch_cmd(cmd);
-
- /*
- * Now we need to grab the lock again. We are about to mess
- * with the request queue and try to find another command.
- */
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}
-completed:
+
return;
-host_lock_held:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
+ not_ready:
+ spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+
/*
* lock q, handle tag, requeue req, and decrement device_busy. We
* must return with queue_lock held.
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-27 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-27 15:04 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-04-27 18:07 ` [PATCH] scsi_requeuest_fn Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-27 18:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-28 17:14 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-29 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030427170440.A29493@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox