From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: unchecked_isa_dma on sparcv9 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:50:17 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030429125017.A21769@lst.de> References: <20030429101925.A20537@lst.de> <20030429.001511.23033900.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:34575 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261328AbTD2KiJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:38:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429.001511.23033900.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:15:11AM -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "David S. Miller" , James.Bottomley@steeleye.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:15:11AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > The only thing host->unchecked_isa_dma = 1 does is to add a __GFP_DMA > flag to certain memory allocations, but IIRC __GFP_DMA is a noop on > sparcv9. So what is this supposed to do? > > It's bogus, delete it. James, could you please apply the following patch? --- 1.10/drivers/scsi/pluto.c Thu Feb 20 14:26:15 2003 +++ edited/drivers/scsi/pluto.c Tue Apr 29 11:27:54 2003 @@ -246,11 +246,6 @@ host->max_channel = inq->channels; host->irq = fc->irq; -#ifdef __sparc_v9__ - host->unchecked_isa_dma = 1; -#endif - - fc->channels = inq->channels + 1; fc->targets = inq->targets; fc->ages = ages;