From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67+ scsi_release_request call queue next
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:18:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030429211835.GA3354@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0304291630510.656-100000@ida.rowland.org>
It is already in bk current and James scsi-misc-2.5. The scsi.c file
also includes Christoph's cleanups. I do not know the change set number.
Alan Stern [stern@rowland.harvard.edu] wrote:
> Mike:
>
> I just noticed that your patch below isn't included in 2.5.68. It still
> works just fine. Is it going to be submitted?
>
> Alan Stern
>
>
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:33:03 -0700
> From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
> To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu
> Subject: [PATCH] 2.5.67+ scsi_release_request call queue next
>
> This patch is against 2.5.67 as of 04-14 as it needs extern for
> scsi_queue_next_request.
>
> I just compiled and booted this patch. I currently do not have a setup to
> check door lock post error recovery.
>
> -andmike
> --
> Michael Anderson
> andmike@us.ibm.com
>
>
> DESC
> The patch adds a call to scsi_queue_next_request from scsi_release_request. It
> also removes a call in scsi_eh_lock_done to scsi_put_command.
> scsi_release_request will do a call to scsi_put_command if needed.
> EDESC
>
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 2 ++
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN drivers/scsi/scsi.c~scsi-release-req drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> --- sysfs-bleed-2.5/drivers/scsi/scsi.c~scsi-release-req Mon Apr 14 15:34:14 2003
> +++ sysfs-bleed-2.5-andmike/drivers/scsi/scsi.c Mon Apr 14 15:34:14 2003
> @@ -224,8 +224,10 @@ void scsi_release_request(Scsi_Request *
> {
> if( req->sr_command != NULL )
> {
> + request_queue_t *q = req->sr_device->request_queue;
> scsi_put_command(req->sr_command);
> req->sr_command = NULL;
> + scsi_queue_next_request(q, NULL);
> }
>
> kfree(req);
> diff -puN drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c~scsi-release-req drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> --- sysfs-bleed-2.5/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c~scsi-release-req Mon Apr 14 15:34:14 2003
> +++ sysfs-bleed-2.5-andmike/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c Mon Apr 14 15:34:14 2003
> @@ -1334,10 +1334,6 @@ static void scsi_eh_lock_done(struct scs
> {
> struct scsi_request *sreq = scmd->sc_request;
>
> - scmd->sc_request = NULL;
> - sreq->sr_command = NULL;
> -
> - scsi_put_command(scmd);
> scsi_release_request(sreq);
> }
>
>
> _
>
>
>
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-29 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-29 20:56 [PATCH] 2.5.67+ scsi_release_request call queue next Alan Stern
2003-04-29 21:18 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-15 6:33 Mike Anderson
2003-04-15 19:39 ` Alan Stern
2003-04-15 22:36 ` Mike Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030429211835.GA3354@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox