public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>,
	Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi-misc-2.5 remove scsi_scan.c EVPD code
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 15:51:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030505155127.A11734@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030505174602.GA3433@beaverton.ibm.com>; from andmike@us.ibm.com on Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:46:02AM -0700

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:46:02AM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Patrick Mansfield [patmans@us.ibm.com] wrote:

> > Right now, we could have an sgid that runs whenever an sg is found (sg
> > hotplug generated via device_register), and stores a sysfs path and the id
> > returned into a flat file.
> 
> I believe devlabel's scsi_unique_id.c file does some of this, though I
> have not looked at it closely.
> 
> -andmike

Yes, it looks very close, and has the underlying infrastructure (uses the
SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND, not sg, so can be used for all upper level linux
scsi devices). It looks like we would need functionallity that is in the
devlabel script itself (to output just a  single ID), maybe just integrate
that into scsi_unique_id. (I did not look closely at devlabel, it has more
lines than the scsi_unique_id.c source.)

It looks like scsi_unique_id should also dump the code set, so it can pick
one code set (the same one) over anoother (if both were ever used by a
single LU).

It fails for character devices, but that is easily fixed by deletion of
the check (SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND works for any scsi device: st, sd, sr
or sg). I deleted the check and it ran ok on a "processor" scsi device,
though the device does not support page 80 or page 83. 

scsi_unique_id should also have some sort of error checking/reporting, so
we can tell if a device is not functioning (versus does not support page
80 or 83).

I don't know how this would be integrated into the scsi device model tree,
given the current flux (class or bus for upper level devices, as well as
for the scsi_device itself).

-- Patrick Mansfield

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-25  0:47 [PATCH] scsi-misc-2.5 remove scsi_scan.c EVPD code Andries.Brouwer
2003-05-05  7:58 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-05 14:17   ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 15:52     ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 16:14       ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 16:26         ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-05 16:57         ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 17:01           ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 16:38   ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-05 16:59     ` James Bottomley
2003-05-05 17:46     ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 22:51       ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-05-06  1:39         ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-06  4:11           ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-05-06  5:58             ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-06 21:11               ` Patrick Mansfield
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25  0:22 Patrick Mansfield

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030505155127.A11734@beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox