public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [0/4]
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 16:44:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030507164427.A28899@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030506010521.GB3852@beaverton.ibm.com>; from andmike@us.ibm.com on Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:05:21PM -0700

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:05:21PM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Well scsi_proc_host_rm will need to be done through some action prior to
> the completion of the drivers "remove" or "storage_disconnect (usb)"
> functions.

Yes.  I think we should move some more stuff from scsi_register/unregister
to add_host/remove_host, in fact basically anything that interacts with the
scsi midlayer.

> > Then we'd have:
> > 
> > 	scsi_alloc_host
> > 		- allocate storage for struct Scsi_Host, some
> > 		  basic initalization.  refcount set to 1;
> 
> I am using sysfs ref counting and increment the ref count on the Scsi_Host
> through device_register and device_get. The scsi_get/put_host wrapper
> would call device_get/put.

right.

> > 	scsi_get_host
> > 		- get a reference to an existing struct Scsi_Host
> > 	scsi_put_host
> > 		- decrement usecount of an existing struct Scsi_Host,
> > 		  free it if this was the last reference
> 
> The sysfs model splits the registering / unregistering so that is why I
> am unregistering in scsi_remove_host, but may not call the free until
> someone calls the final put.

I completly agree with that.  (did something above read like I was
disagreeing?  I'm a bit confused on this comment..)

> > 	scsi_add_host
> > 		- register host with the scsi midlayer
> 
> This is where I am registering the Scsi_Host struct device as we know
> the parent by this point. On return the ref count on Scsi_Host should be
> at least 1.

yupp, that's fine with me,

> 
> > 	scsi_remove_host
> > 		- unregister host with the scsi midlayer, force all
> > 		  I/O to fail from now on and never call back into
> > 		  the driver.
> 
> This is where I am unregistering the Scsi_Host struct device.

dio.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-05  8:33 [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [0/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05  8:34 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [1/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05  8:35   ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [2/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05  8:37     ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [3/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05  8:38       ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [4/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05  8:38 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [0/4] Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-05  9:40   ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-05 10:00     ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05  9:48   ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 10:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06  1:05       ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-07 15:44         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-05-07 16:15           ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-07 16:41             ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-05 11:46 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-05 21:45   ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-06  1:12     ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-06 16:28 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-06 17:23   ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-07 23:19     ` Willem Riede
2003-05-08  0:09       ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-08  1:44       ` Mike Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030507164427.A28899@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox