From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [0/4]
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 17:41:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030507174152.A31719@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030507161546.GA3368@beaverton.ibm.com>; from andmike@us.ibm.com on Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:15:46AM -0700
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:15:46AM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> No I did not read that you where disagreeing I was just indicating that
> I was not calling any sysfs functions from scsi_register do that the
> Scsi_Host's struct device and struct class where not initialized until
> scsi_add_host.
>
> After reading you mail the other day I believe a better model would be
> to split the device_register using the device_initialize and device_add
> functions. This will mean that after the return of scsi_register
> (scsi_alloc_host) that refcount will be 1 and the Scsi_Host struct is
> ready to be used.
That actually sounds like a good idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-07 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-05 8:33 [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [0/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 8:34 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [1/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 8:35 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [2/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 8:37 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [3/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 8:38 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [4/4] Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 8:38 ` [RFC] scsi host sysfs support again [0/4] Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-05 9:40 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-05 10:00 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 9:48 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-05 10:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06 1:05 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-07 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07 16:15 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-07 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-05-05 11:46 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-05 21:45 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-06 1:12 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-06 16:28 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-06 17:23 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-07 23:19 ` Willem Riede
2003-05-08 0:09 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-08 1:44 ` Mike Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030507174152.A31719@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox