From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andries Brouwer Subject: Re: "do ata" scsi command? Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:37:32 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030516183732.GA102@win.tue.nl> References: <20030515230223.GA516@gtf.org> <20030516060324.GT812@suse.de> <3EC5135F.50803@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.3.6]:25353 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264534AbTEPSYr (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 14:24:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EC5135F.50803@pobox.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:35:43PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I have chosen the standard, existing scsi-generic nterface as the one by > which raw taskfiles will be sent to devices. The taskfile will be > wrapped inside a SCSI cdb. To me this solution is the most flexibility > for least cost. > > So, what opcode do I choose for "send taskfile"? Either (a) pick a > vendor-specific one, or (b) someone else already chose an opcode. > > So my post was really these questions: a or b? if b, what opcode? 0xAA ? (have you seen rfc2143 ?)