From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [RFR] a new SCSI driver Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:48:36 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030525124836.A31489@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200305251119.h4PBJOal000678@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <1053859525.1571.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:30988 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261985AbTEYLf3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 07:35:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1053859525.1571.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>; from arjanv@redhat.com on Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:45:25PM +0200 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: john@grabjohn.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:45:25PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 13:19, john@grabjohn.com wrote: > > Also embedded world != PDAs. I was thinking more of things like PVRs, and blade > > servers. What about solid state video cameras? Are they going to use PIO mode > > ATA? > on common misunderstanding ; PATA != PIO mode ATA but Parallel ATA, as > opposed to Serial ATA I was aware of that point. That's why I used the term "PIO mode ATA" to describe something which isn't "PATA". -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html