From: "B. D. Elliott" <bde@nwlink.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scsi_add_device() broken? (was Re: SBP2 hotplug doesn't update /proc/partitions)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:38:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030613041751.016216ABFD@smtp4.pacifier.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030613024044.GA499@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:40:44PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:52:43PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:28:00PM -0700, Torrey Hoffman wrote:
> > > I am now running 2.5.70-bk15, and with slab debugging turned off SBP2
> > > mostly works. However, I just had an interesting glitch show up.
> > >
> > > I plugged in a 120 GB drive which had two VFAT partitions, mounted them,
> > > copied some data to them, unmounted them, and unplugged the drive.
> > > That worked perfectly. (This was the first use of SBP2 after booting.)
> > >
> > > Then I plugged in a 250 GB drive with a single reiserfs partition. The
> > > SBP2 driver detected the drive correctly, but the kernel's idea of what
> > > partitions are available was not updated.
> > >
> > > /proc/partitions still has the old, stale data from the 120 GB drive and
> > > looks like this: (skipping my hda partitions)
> >
> > Sounds like the scsi layer is keeping stale info. I'd say this is
> > suspiciously similar to what's causing your oops in your later email.
> > Track down where the stale info comes from, and I think you'll find the
> > cause of both your problems.
>
> scsi0 : SCSI emulation for IEEE-1394 SBP-2 Devices
> ieee1394: sbp2: Query logins to SBP-2 device successful
> ieee1394: sbp2: Maximum concurrent logins supported: 1
> ieee1394: sbp2: Number of active logins: 0
> ieee1394: sbp2: Logged into SBP-2 device
> ieee1394: sbp2: Node[02:1023]: Max speed [S400] - Max payload [2048]
> Vendor: FireWire Model: 1394 Disk Drive Rev: G603
> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> SCSI device sda: 240121728 512-byte hdwr sectors (122942 MB)
> sda: cache data unavailable
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
> sda: unknown partition table
> devfs_mk_dir: invalid argument.<5>Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
This particular error occurs because the scsi/host*/bus*/target*/lun* path
hasn't yet been set up in scsi_add_lun before calling scsi_device_register.
This also occurs for usb disk registration. (I don't know why this doesn't
happen for devices that register at boot time.) Moving the call to
scsi_device_register (at scsi_scan.c:622) after the sprintf appears to fix
both the usb and ieee1934 problems.
> Note, the "unknown partition table" is ok for me, because I am using a
> whole-disk filesystem. However, the devfs_mk_dir() error is suspicious.
> Note, I use devfs. 2.5.69+bk (just before 2.6.70) things worked fine.
> Now, /dev/sda is not being created. Nothing in /dev/scsi/ either, but:
>
> hopper:~# cat /proc/scsi/sbp2/0
> Host scsi0 : SBP-2 IEEE-1394 (ohci1394)
> Driver version : $Rev: 942 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
A side note here: The "$Rev: 942..." message is marked as __devinitdata
which causes an oops on sparc64 when attempting the above "cat", as the
mapping for that data is apparently deleted after module initialization.
> Module options :
> max_speed : S400
> max_sectors : 255
> serialize_io : no
> exclusive_login : no
>
> Attached devices :
> [Channel: 00, Id: 00, Lun: 00] Direct-Access FireWire 1394 Disk Drive
>
>
> Also, /sys/bus/scsi/devices/0:0:0:0 exists, with a block link to sda.
>
> I suspect this is a problem where scsi_add_device() is not doing all the
> stuff it needs to (does anything besides ieee1394 use scsi_add_device
> and scsi_remove_device?).
>
>
> --
> Debian - http://www.debian.org/
> Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
> Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
> Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
B. D. Elliott bde@nwlink.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-13 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1054770509.1198.79.camel@torrey.et.myrio.com>
[not found] ` <3EDE870C.1EFA566C@digeo.com>
[not found] ` <1054838369.1737.11.camel@torrey.et.myrio.com>
[not found] ` <20030605175412.GF625@phunnypharm.org>
[not found] ` <1054858724.3519.19.camel@torrey.et.myrio.com>
[not found] ` <20030606025721.GJ625@phunnypharm.org>
[not found] ` <1055446080.3480.291.camel@torrey.et.myrio.com>
[not found] ` <20030612195243.GV4695@phunnypharm.org>
2003-06-13 2:40 ` scsi_add_device() broken? (was Re: SBP2 hotplug doesn't update /proc/partitions) Ben Collins
2003-06-13 4:38 ` B. D. Elliott [this message]
2003-06-13 16:08 ` [PATCH] " Ben Collins
2003-06-13 17:19 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030613041751.016216ABFD@smtp4.pacifier.net \
--to=bde@nwlink.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox