From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] [Trivial Patch] scsi_register-002 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 01:42:07 +1000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030623235717.86B342C01B@lists.samba.org> References: <1056377839.13528.46.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Return-path: Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:47299 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264454AbTFWXnJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:43:09 -0400 In-reply-to: Your message of "23 Jun 2003 15:17:20 +0100." <1056377839.13528.46.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: aacraid@adaptec.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In message <1056377839.13528.46.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> you write: > On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 07:56, Rusty Trivial Russell wrote: > > (Included in 2.5) > > From: Michael Still > > > > > > This patch has been generated as part of my scsi_register audit of the 2. 5.45 kernel tree. scsi_register() can fail, returning a NULL pointer, and the f ailure case was not being handled here... > > Fix is subtly wrong because of aac_count, fixed up in my tree will push > to Marcelo with the rest of the aacraid updates soon Are you planning on updating the 2.5 one too? This patch went in 2.5, as indicated above, which is bad... Thanks! Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.