From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Anderson Subject: Re: [PATCH] pull scsi_scan_host out of scsi_add_host Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:03:35 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030708080334.GA2451@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20030707143056.GA1177@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:26278 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266913AbTGHHqt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2003 03:46:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030707143056.GA1177@lst.de> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig [hch@lst.de] wrote: > As Douglas mentioned on this list a while ago there's hardware these > days where we don't want to automatically perform an initial bus scan > in scsi_add_host. Currently we only have ieee1394 in the tree but > I can imagine more uses like iscsi or certain fc setups. > > This patch removes the call to scsi_scan_host from scsi_add_host > and moves it into the drivers that want in. Would we want to make a symmetric interface and pull the unscan out of scsi_remove_host also? -andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@us.ibm.com