From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] add sysfs attributes to scan and delete scsi_devices Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:13:51 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030708221350.A19804@infradead.org> References: <20030708134016.A32161@beaverton.ibm.com> <1057697416.1825.10.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:48906 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267647AbTGHU7Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:59:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1057697416.1825.10.camel@mulgrave>; from James.Bottomley@steeleye.com on Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:50:15PM -0500 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Patrick Mansfield , SCSI Mailing List On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:50:15PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I'm not convinced we need a bus file for this. What's the reason we > can't have a per host file instead? > > I'm thinking of the hotplug case where you know the sysfs path to the > card just inserted. Translating that to a hostid will be rather hard. After thinking about this again I tend to agree with you that a per-host file sounds like the better idea.