From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] QLogic qla2xxx driver update available (v8.00.00b4). Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:26:22 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030718122622.GD6520@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20030718122304.A23013@infradead.org> <20030718121202.GC6520@marowsky-bree.de> <20030718131352.A26546@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:32745 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265069AbTGRMLc (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:11:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030718131352.A26546@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Vasquez , Linux-Kernel , Linux-SCSI On 2003-07-18T13:13:52, Christoph Hellwig said: > > Please come and attend the multipath session at the Kernel Summit a= nd/or > > the Ottawa Linux Symposium next week to learn why this is a bad ide= a and > > how it can be done better -> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/ > -ENOTIME :) Well, I was inviting Andrew, mostly, I know that you are around for KS/OLS and are also probably already convinced ;-) > > QLogic is reasonably good already in that it can be disabled via a > > module parameter (ql2xfailover=3D0), allowing the higher level solu= tions > > to operate. > Given that this module never was in 2.4 I don't see clear backwards > compatiblity problems.. You are being very funny. No, nobody ever shipped a qlogic driver. Right. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG =20 "If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)= =2E" -- Capt. Edward A. Murphy -- Louis Pasteur - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html