From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: dpt_i2o in 2.6.0_test* Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:49:47 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030811194947.A5859@infradead.org> References: <20030809211706.A1938@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:272 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S273018AbTHKStw (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:49:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from jfbeam@bluetronic.net on Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:44:32PM -0400 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Ricky Beam Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Alexandru N. Barloiu" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:44:32PM -0400, Ricky Beam wrote: > On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >According to Alan the fix is to use the i2o_scsi driver instead. > > Doing so removes support for DPT's RAID management software. > > Start screaming at Adaptec to update their stinking driver! Or port their managment software to the generic i2o driver. Once someone did that we should probably completly kill off dpt_i2o - it's really pointless to have a vendor driver if there's a class driver already. And given certain issues we have with vendor driver quality..