From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: USB storage problems on OHCI.. Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:44:04 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030922094404.A1056@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20030922004943.E32009@one-eyed-alien.net> <20030922153123.A23388@infradead.org> <20030922161104.A24155@infradead.org> <20030922084930.A679@beaverton.ibm.com> <20030922173732.A25639@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:12744 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263218AbTIVQpr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:45:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030922173732.A25639@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:37:32PM +0100 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Alan Stern , Matthew Dharm , Linus Torvalds , David Brownell , Greg KH , USB development list , SCSI development list On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:37:32PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > What I meant is not adding a blist flags member at all but rather > setting skip_ms_page_8 and skip_ms_page_3f from ->slave_alloc. > > But I probably missed something obvious :) The current code allows us to set or clear a given bit, but not both. So if we set them in slave_alloc, they can't be cleared without adding other flags or code. -- Patrick Mansfield