From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: printk the cdb's that interest me
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:52:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030923095248.A9896@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1064331642.10473.23.camel@patehci2>; from p.lavarre@ieee.org on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:40:42AM -0600
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:40:42AM -0600, Pat LaVarre wrote:
>
> Can I somehow easily trace only all the scsi cdb's that fail?
>
> How about a patch to trace only the cdb's that fail between the sk asc =
> x 6 28 GoneReady of disc insertion and the sk asc = x 2 3A DiskAbsent?
>
> I'm guessing I have to reach down into usb-storage, ide-cd, ide-scsi
> etc. to find a line of code thru which all cdb's pass. I see
> CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG=y gives me all cdb's and so much more besides
> that often I run with =n. I want only cdb's that interest me to
> distract me from my other printk.
I have never found the SCSI_LOG_ stuff to be very useful when trying to
track all cdb's, the output is not well formatted, and is inconsistent.
The split of upper/middle/lower (UL/ML/LL) in the logging is not very
useful.
All scsi core cdb's are sent via the host->queuecommand, there are only
two callers of it (in 2.6).
Ignoring the non-auto sense request and TUR in scsi_error.c, all the scsi
core cdb's sent to the LLDD go out via scsi_dispatch_cmd, and come back
via scsi_softirq.
cdb logging should dump the host/chan/id/lun and at least the opcode: on
send in scsi_dispatch_cmd or before shost->queuecommand is called; and on
completion in scsi_decide_disposition, or in scsi_softirq, and maybe in
scsi_error.c in two places. Plus the result + possible sense data on
completion.
You could then add debug code to turn on/off the cdb logging for certain
conditions, like your sense key/asc.
Of course cdb's that do not make it to the LLDD would not be logged.
> lost page write due to I/O error on sr1
> SCSI error : <2 0 0 0> return code = 0x10000
> end_request: I/O error, dev sr1, sector 54044096
> Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 6755512
>
> 1) I think I get these for less than all interesting errors.
>
> In particular, I think I don't see not-retried unit attentions reported
> this way, even though unit attentions change such things as the
> 2.6.0-test4 /proc/sys/dev/cdrom/info
>
> 2) I have no confident idea of what the cdb was, and zero idea of what
> the auto-sensed sk asc ascq info was.
It got a DID_NO_CONNECT (host busy 0x01), so there should be no sense
data. Or do you mean what was the sense data was for an IO before the
failed one?
-- Patrick Mansfield
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-23 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-23 15:40 printk the cdb's that interest me Pat LaVarre
2003-09-23 16:52 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-09-24 15:07 ` Pat LaVarre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030923095248.A9896@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox