From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: max GiB written per boot Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:12:25 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031007151225.0a65dcb7.rddunlap@osdl.org> References: <1064271322.4797.9.camel@patehci2> <1064847281.24854.2.camel@patehci2> <1064850600.25057.7.camel@patehci2> <20030929164654.GS15415@suse.de> <1064855570.3184.3.camel@patehci2> <1064865746.4262.63.camel@patehci2> <1065460336.10804.1.camel@patehci2> <1065474044.6835.44.camel@patehci2> <1065484077.2899.1.camel@patehci2> <20031007055714.GO972@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:53985 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262930AbTJGWVJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:21:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20031007055714.GO972@suse.de> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: p.lavarre@ieee.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 07:57:14 +0200 Jens Axboe wrote: | > | > Having hdc=ide-scsi matter I think is a clue. | > | > I don't yet know if this apparent correlation will hold up or not. | | Yeah, ide-scsi is broken so you probably shouldn't be using it. Is there any sense in trying to repair it? I could spend some time on it... -- ~Randy