From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [announce] scsi_id 0.1 - generate unique scsi id Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:23:40 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031022172340.A25011@infradead.org> References: <20031021165857.A8240@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031022153140.A22298@infradead.org> <1066808536.27285.19.camel@w-stekloff.beaverton.ibm.com> <20031022154638.A22952@infradead.org> <1066809889.27285.36.camel@w-stekloff.beaverton.ibm.com> <20031022155231.GQ18370@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20031022091519.A11995@beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:8723 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263454AbTJVQZF (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:25:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031022091519.A11995@beaverton.ibm.com>; from patmans@us.ibm.com on Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:15:19AM -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Mansfield Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Daniel Stekloff , linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:15:19AM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > Should we use , rather than another new directory? No. is reserved for kernel headers.