From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: sg utils sg_io -i 0x24 -y "12 00:00:00 24 00" Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:51:45 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031107095145.A3785@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <1068165515.28505.29.camel@patrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:64219 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264525AbTKGRwU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:52:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1068165515.28505.29.camel@patrh9>; from p.lavarre@ieee.org on Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:38:36PM -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Pat LaVarre Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:38:36PM -0700, Pat LaVarre wrote: Do you have a tar ball or such of all the code? Or is this still very much a work in progress? I don't see all the functions in the patch, for example, gcs_in. I was going to say put the functions in a library, but maybe you already are headed that way. Then create a libsgio or such, and users like sg_utils, scsi_id, cdrecord, scsidev, etc. could link with sgio. And lose the macros I, Y, etc, just use the function name, or at least have more meaningful macro names. The command line plscsi could support both long and short names (-i or --gcs-in). -- Patrick Mansfield