From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix Sony USB mass storage - pass larger receive buffer Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:13:10 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031112161310.A21175@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20031112155029.A20986@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031112160921.A10818@one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:4044 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261776AbTKMAOA (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:14:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031112160921.A10818@one-eyed-alien.net>; from mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net on Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:09:21PM -0800 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, ronald@kuetemeier.com, dmitrik@users.sourceforge.net, idan@idanso.dyndns.org On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:09:21PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > James - can you please apply? This should not affect other devices since > > we are not changing the requested length, just the size of the receive > > buffer. > > This is a terrible idea. > > There is a large number of devices which choke if those two values do not > match. This is what we do in 2.4 - does USB fix it up for 2.4? Oh well. -- Patrick Mansfield