From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: Time to conclude the Sony USB mass storage thread Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:58:23 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031114095823.A3597@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <1068825146.2134.6.camel@mulgrave> <20031114092644.A2794@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031114093503.B19467@one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:49043 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264558AbTKNR6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:58:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031114093503.B19467@one-eyed-alien.net>; from mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net on Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:35:03AM -0800 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, SCSI Mailing List On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:35:03AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I'm strongly attempted to agree with you guys.... blacklisting looks like > the way to go. > > I'm concerned about the names, tho.... BLIST_MS_SKIP_PAGE_08 sounds more > general than it is -- as I understand it, this flag will only affect sd.c, > tho it looks much more general. We can change the name. > I think I'd rather tweak the structure in slave_configure, where it will be > easier to add more logic if people decide we need it in the future. Unlike scsi_devinfo/dev_flags, we can't override slave_configure changes (unless you add other code). -- Patrick Mansfield