From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: [usb-storage] Re: Time to conclude the Sony USB mass storage thread Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:02:46 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031115160246.A5997@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20031114125648.A5811@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031114181312.A1790@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031115122052.A9275@one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.105]:3816 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262186AbTKPADD (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:03:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031115122052.A9275@one-eyed-alien.net>; from mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net on Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:20:52PM -0800 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, SCSI Mailing List On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:20:52PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I presume your testing included mount, read, write, and umount? Yes, with no problems. I almost did not test mount due to build problems with vfat (I should have rebuilt the kernel before modules after enabling and building vfat as module), and was told write's to the device did not work with 2.4 but they worked fine for me. > I'm okay with the patch. It could use some more comments, but that's not > really necessary. We ought to change the define names to make more sense. -- Patrick Mansfield