From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: [usb-storage] Re: Time to conclude the Sony USB mass storage thread Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:57:05 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031117085705.A18005@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20031114125648.A5811@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031114181312.A1790@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031116213319.B1711@one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:41970 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263526AbTKQQ5X (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:57:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031116213319.B1711@one-eyed-alien.net>; from mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net on Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:33:19PM -0800 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, SCSI Mailing List On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:33:19PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > A clarification question: Are you going to merge the patch via the > linux-scsi tree, or should I try to get it merged via the linux-usb tree? Matthew - Yes, merge via linux-usb. Thanks. -- Patrick Mansfield