From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: host_self_blocked question/bug? Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:44:19 +0000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031126134419.A6004@infradead.org> References: <3FC3CDCF.4030105@us.ibm.com> <1069797320.1787.220.camel@mulgrave> <3FC3D82D.2030604@us.ibm.com> <20031125163204.A5150@beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:40454 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263839AbTKZNoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:44:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031125163204.A5150@beaverton.ibm.com>; from patmans@us.ibm.com on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:32:04PM -0800 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Mansfield Cc: Brian King , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:32:04PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > (There should be locking around all the setting and checking of > host_self_blocked.) the same is true for many of the 1 bit bitfileds in struct Scsi_Host/ scsi_device, we should probably use the atomic bitmap operations for those. It's been on my todo list for a while, but I wonder whether that's enough of an interface change to be postponed to 2.7.x.