From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: [announce] scsi_id release 0.2 Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:38:32 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031207123832.A30616@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20031205151810.A8891@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031207153802.GA6700@suse.de> <20031207114242.A29572@beaverton.ibm.com> <20031207195915.GA6714@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.105]:4590 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264512AbTLGUiu (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:38:50 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031207195915.GA6714@suse.de>; from olh@suse.de on Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 08:59:15PM +0100 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Olaf Hering Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 08:59:15PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Sun, Dec 07, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > Is it breaking your build? If so I'll just remove it. > > Yes, just try to build a udev debug binary. It worked fine for me, something must be different in our build environments. I have: [elm3b79 udev-bk]$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) I should probably upgrade. But in any case I applied your patch to my view, thanks. -- Patrick Mansfield