From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn-ugMvIWC9OiRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: 'Xose Vazquez Perez'
<xose-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>,
"'linux-aacraid-devel-XtjxT7Vmt5ZskZv2Y/7f+AC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org'"
<linux-aacraid-devel-XtjxT7Vmt5ZskZv2Y/7f+AC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>,
'linux-scsi' <linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1.1.4-2313 aacraid driver for LiNUX 2.4.25-pre4
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:51:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040107205121.GA19162@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2CB6D8BA015124783C0EB9B33D24FFD047F90-b070rUroPABnRV3uFxCcHmPGcypz5H/V@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3126 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:12:44PM -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> +#define aac_spin_lock_irq(host_lock)
> spin_lock_irq(&io_request_lock)
> +#define aac_spin_unlock_irqrestore(host_lock, cpu_flags)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock, cpu_flags)
> +#define aac_spin_unlock_irq(host_lock)
> spin_unlock_irq(&io_request_lock)
>
>
> ewwww
>
> mgs> In Adaptec's version of the code, this is part of a kernel versioning
> mgs> ifdef, to use the `host_lock' passed in, or the io_request_lock global
> mgs> Better here than at each locale. However, I think I chose the wrong
> mgs> side of the ifdef, doesn't 2.4.25-pre4 use host->host_lock?
there are other, cleaner ways to achieve this imo
> + * bit addressing, and we have more than 32 bit addressing worth of
> + * memory and if the controller supports 64 bit scatter gather
> elements.
> + */
> + if( (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > 4) && (num_physpages > (0xFFFFFFFFULL >>
> PAGE_SHIFT)) && (dev->adapter_info.options &
> + dev->dac_support = 1;
> }
>
> that looks broken, at least drivers should never need to check num_physpages
> etc etc
>
> mgs> If the system has less than 4G of memory, it is in the interest of
> mgs> performance to use the 32 bit variants of the adapter packets. Smaller
> mgs> frames, and capable of a larger number of scatter-gather elements.
oh sure; imo the pci_set_dma_mask() function should check this, not the
driver.
> why on earth is that in a driver?????
>
> mgs> The management tools issue ioctls to query for the information. RAID
> mgs> drivers require management tool support.
sounds like a really really broken ioctl interface then. Is the source of
these tools public so that we can fix them ?
>
> +# define strlcpy(s1,s2,n) strncpy(s1,s2,n);s1[n-1]='\0'
>
>
> this is very broken; consider
>
> if (foo)
> bar(foo);
> else
> strlcpy(foo,bar,3);
>
> mgs> this is `good enough' for the driver, s1 in the driver context is
> mgs> not a value of null.
ehm read again. My example was not of the foo==NULL case but that your
define had 2 statements where the "else" will only apply to the first
> mgs> This is in here for compatibility reasons (should be in compat.h),
> mgs> could be dropped as min is defined by the include framework. This
> mgs> `minimal' definition is good enough for the driver since locally
> mgs> both a and b are `constants'.
then use the exact 2.4/2.6 definition in a compat.h or so...
> mgs> Only the __x86_64__ architecture has the register_ioctl32_conversion
> mgs> handler. This is reflection of what has been tested with the currently
> mgs> available management tools. The only 64 bit architecture that has
> mgs> the management tools compiled as a 64 bit applications is for the AMD64
> mgs> right now. I have not yet determined how to figure out if a 32 bit
> mgs> legacy app or a 64 bit updated app has issued the ioctl call to the
> mgs> driver under other architectures.
yep that's what I call fishy ;)
broken ioctls for a broken interface ;(
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 20:12 [PATCH] 1.1.4-2313 aacraid driver for LiNUX 2.4.25-pre4 Salyzyn, Mark
[not found] ` <C2CB6D8BA015124783C0EB9B33D24FFD047F90-b070rUroPABnRV3uFxCcHmPGcypz5H/V@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-07 20:51 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-07 18:12 Xose Vazquez Perez
[not found] ` <3FFC4C09.3020103-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-07 18:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-07 21:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-08 15:58 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
[not found] ` <3FFD7E3A.3010808-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-08 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040107205121.GA19162@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-aacraid-devel-XtjxT7Vmt5ZskZv2Y/7f+AC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark_salyzyn-ugMvIWC9OiRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xose-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).