From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH] ips driver for 2.4.23-pre4 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:36:17 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040108193617.GA5244@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <3FFC5B2C.6000302@wanadoo.es> <20040108171531.B12595@infradead.org> <3FFD9F0E.4060604@wanadoo.es> <20040108182135.A13623@infradead.org> <3FFDA639.7090005@wanadoo.es> <1073588778.4429.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <3FFDAFCF.3000908@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:21155 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266266AbUAHTgk (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:36:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFDAFCF.3000908@wanadoo.es> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi , Tosatti --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:30:23PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: >=20 > > who (at least in the RH case) often say "get it in upstream kernel > > first". >=20 > that is a recent policy for _Fedora_. Or tell me why RHEL kernel > patches are so big=20 no it is not recent policy. RHEL has basically the same policy for drivers. --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//bExxULwo51rQBIRAh/9AKCS5YJe/aIqOPSaBvlhQ/vY8hCDOACgphHU hdz7C4Z4mp44VsrF6NkOBGw= =Jz8d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--