From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael W. Shaffer" Subject: Re: [patch] Have qla2xxx driver bind fcports. Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:40:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040119214030.78010.qmail@web10408.mail.yahoo.com> References: <1074532278.1645.24.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from web10408.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.130.110]:21661 "HELO web10408.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264329AbUASVkc (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:40:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1074532278.1645.24.camel@mulgrave> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , Andrew Vasquez Cc: Andrew Morton , SCSI Mailing List > As far as the resync goes, I'd like to wait a while just to > see if any more bugs turn up in the ioctl/failover separation > piece ... it will be easier to debug if we have fewer changes, > so how does early 2.6.2 sound for this (depending, of course, > on when that actually is)? Thanks to everyone for figuring this out so quickly. Should I assume that this fix will be merged into 2.6.1-mm5 or so, and eventually into 2.6.2? I'll probably continue to do some beta testing on this system with the patches I have now, but I would most likely wait until the LUN fix is into the -mm tree before trying to move into production with it. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus