From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Removing the qlogicfc driver Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:09:34 +0000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040201160934.A15908@infradead.org> References: <1074606124.400d302cac80e@imp2-l.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:19979 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265353AbUBAQJg (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:09:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1074606124.400d302cac80e@imp2-l.free.fr>; from christophe.varoqui@free.fr on Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:42:04PM +0100 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: christophe.varoqui@free.fr Cc: Andrew Vasquez , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:42:04PM +0100, christophe.varoqui@free.fr wrote: > > Please let me know how it works out for you. I'd like to forward > > it along for inclusion once I get a bit more internal runtime in my > > rings. > > > I report it works flawlessly with "2.6.0-udm5 (== mm2) + qla8b8 + patch". This means there are no other objections and we can remove driver?