public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frank Pieczynski <pieczy@web.de>
Subject: Re: BUG in sd.c
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:14:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040204171401.GA1687@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0402041108310.6676-100000@ida.rowland.org>

Alan Stern [stern@rowland.harvard.edu] wrote:
> The following Bugzilla entry:
> 
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1986
> 
> reports a problem with a USB card reader.  The cause and resolution of
> that problem are irrelevant to this list, but the manifestation of the
> problem may have been that the device replied with Check Condition (and no
> sense data) to every command.
> 
> At any rate, this caused an oops as a result of sd.c calling 
> scsi_disk_get() after the device's reference count had gone to 0.  Can 
> someone look at this and see if sd.c needs to be fixed?
> 
> Alan Stern

Just a quick look. We are racing scsi_disk_release with sd_open. The
return code check in scsi_disk_get from the call to kobject_get is
worthless. The kobject_get will take do a inc even if we may already be
in release. This will cause a oops as we will fail the scsi_device_get
call in scsi_disk_get which will cause a call to kobject_put on a struct
that will most likely be free'd. 

Maybe I am still reading the block layer locking wrong, but I do not see a
method to close the race with blkdev_open. I will look at this some more
and see if I can get a clue what I am missing.

-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-04 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-04 16:13 BUG in sd.c Alan Stern
2004-02-04 17:14 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
2004-02-19 15:00   ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040204171401.GA1687@beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pieczy@web.de \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox