From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] unique_id for ide-scsi Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:06:05 +0000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040209160605.B23604@infradead.org> References: <20040209155440.GQ3944@tpkurt.garloff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:60944 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263448AbUBIQGI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:06:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040209155440.GQ3944@tpkurt.garloff.de>; from garloff@suse.de on Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:54:40PM +0100 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Kurt Garloff , Linux SCSI list , Willem Riede , James Bottomley On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:54:40PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote: > Hi, > > most scsi host adapters do fill in their ioport into thos host's > unique_id field. > ide-scsi does not. The attached patch changes it. > > Caveats: It puts the first PATA port there, the SATA port are not > considered. Are there SATA chips that don't have PATA ports? What do you need this for? I'd prefer to completly nuke unique_id in 2.7.