From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
hch@infradead.org, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
pbadari@us.ibm.com, willy@debian.org
Subject: Re: lots and lots of disks again
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:27:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040217152714.GG3810@tpkurt.garloff.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1077031099.1757.24.camel@mulgrave>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 614 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:18:07AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> The correct way to solve this is an all or nothing migration gated by a
> boot time flag.
Agreed. Having it the new scheme optional now (defaulting to off),
deprecating the old numbers in 2.7 (defaulting new scheme to on)
and drop from 2.8 looks like a reasonable plan to me.
Now we ionly need to get some device space allocated.
PS: I believe 64 partitions is enough.
Regards,
--
Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> Cologne, DE
SUSE LINUX AG, Nuernberg, DE SUSE Labs (Head)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-17 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 10:45 lots and lots of disks again Andrew Morton
2004-02-10 11:04 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 11:26 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 15:47 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 16:08 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 20:10 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-10 20:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-10 20:58 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 21:21 ` viro
2004-02-10 21:34 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 21:42 ` viro
2004-02-10 22:28 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 14:56 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-11 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 22:09 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-11 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 22:53 ` viro
2004-02-12 15:00 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-12 15:20 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-12 15:57 ` viro
2004-02-12 16:18 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-12 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-16 12:40 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-16 22:57 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 0:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 7:57 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-17 15:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 15:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-17 14:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 15:18 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 15:27 ` Kurt Garloff [this message]
2004-02-29 16:41 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-29 23:31 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-03 19:30 ` Mike Anderson
2004-03-03 19:55 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-17 15:50 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 17:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 18:44 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-13 0:05 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-16 12:31 ` Kurt Garloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040217152714.GG3810@tpkurt.garloff.de \
--to=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox