public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
	viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	hch@infradead.org, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	pbadari@us.ibm.com, willy@debian.org
Subject: Re: lots and lots of disks again
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 00:31:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040229233104.GC13934@tpkurt.garloff.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1078072902.1779.41.camel@mulgrave>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1182 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 10:41:36AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> OK, this all went quiet again.
> 
> The choices are between the current patch from Kurt which is limited to
> 16 partitions, or a new patch (which no-one has yet produced) to raise
> us to 64 partitions on a new major number with a switching scheme.

And those two solutions don't even exclude each other ;-)

> Kurt, since you're pushing the patch, which do you want me to do?  Apply
> your current patch for 16 or wait for a new one for 64?

Sticking with the old majors for now has the advantage that we don't
force people with many disks to get all the userspace fixed immediately.

And for those needing we introduce ~22 bits of (4 majors) with 64
partitions and provide a switch. Or actually reserve ~24 bits for
/dev/disk and start using it with SCSI ;-)

So, I'd do both.
For now, I would to have my patch applied.
Let's see what Linus thinks about the /dev/disk thing. I know there are
long term plans in that direction.

Regards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff  <garloff@suse.de>                            Cologne, DE 
SUSE LINUX AG, Nuernberg, DE                          SUSE Labs (Head)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-29 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-04 10:45 lots and lots of disks again Andrew Morton
2004-02-10 11:04 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 11:26   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 13:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 15:47       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 15:52         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 16:08           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 20:10             ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-10 20:11               ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-10 20:58               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 21:21                 ` viro
2004-02-10 21:34                   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 21:42                     ` viro
2004-02-10 22:28                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 18:26         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 14:56           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-11 21:28             ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 22:09               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-11 22:29                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 22:53                   ` viro
2004-02-12 15:00                     ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-12 15:20                       ` James Bottomley
2004-02-12 15:57                       ` viro
2004-02-12 16:18                         ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-12 16:43                           ` James Bottomley
2004-02-16 12:40                             ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-16 22:57                               ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17  0:56                                 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17  7:57                                   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-17 15:08                                     ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 15:28                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-17 14:49                                   ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 15:18                                     ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 15:27                                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-29 16:41                                         ` James Bottomley
2004-02-29 23:31                                           ` Kurt Garloff [this message]
2004-03-03 19:30                                           ` Mike Anderson
2004-03-03 19:55                                             ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-17 15:50                                       ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 17:57                                         ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 18:44                                           ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-13  0:05                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-16 12:31                         ` Kurt Garloff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040229233104.GC13934@tpkurt.garloff.de \
    --to=garloff@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox