From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: ADAPTEC 2.4 drivers too old Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:18:48 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040313191848.GB12292@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <405351A5.3010708@wanadoo.es> <1079203519.4446.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <40535C61.1020408@wanadoo.es> <40535E45.10102@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37325 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263167AbUCMTTA (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:19:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40535E45.10102@wanadoo.es> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: 'linux-scsi' --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 08:17:25PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > >Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > >>I object to the words "too old" in your subject. > >>The reality is that 2.4 doesn't have the brand-spanking-newest driver > >>version *numbers*. So what? Newer != automatically better. > > > > > >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107456492323846&w=2 > > > >"... and left at least the aic79xx driver in a worse state than it > >was in before ..." > > > > there are more examples.... > > Do you call to aacraid stable driver ? As Christoph said: we're open to individual patches that fix bugs.... Please send them. --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAU16XxULwo51rQBIRApsnAJ0cHmbzHoj11/cfdfw89Y4VBNbopgCfRfEV zWBgPJXIWGuudqidlkiEgbU= =IRcq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6--