From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Fusion problems with 2.6.5rc1 on AMD x86-64 IV Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:53:55 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040317165355.37c846f0.ak@suse.de> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57040DB1E2@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:33478 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261809AbUCQQPA (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:15:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57040DB1E2@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Emoore@lsil.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:58:09 -0500 "Moore, Eric Dean" wrote: > There is a bug in the driver where we do three > seperate memory allocations for the request/reply FIFOs > that need to be on the same 4gb boundary. This is on my todo list, > hope to fix soon. The problem seems to be the broke consistent dma mask. I currently just mask it with 0xffffffff in pci_alloc_consistent and why that workaround it works. -Andi