From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: sym2 probs in bk-scsi tree Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:40:45 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040408154045.GD18329@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20040407231820.66dd76cd.akpm@osdl.org> <20040408145700.GB18329@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <40756CB3.5010902@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:28371 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261899AbUDHPkq (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:40:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40756CB3.5010902@us.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Brian King Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:16:03AM -0500, Brian King wrote: > >They certainly are scary. What is device 15 on this scsi bus? This > >looks like domain validation being applied to a device that can't do it > >to me. Did I get that right, James? > > Looks like a SES to me. Would it make sense to not log errors during > domain validation? I was thinking more about disabling domain validation towards these kinds of devices ... -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain