public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masao Fukuchi <fukuchi.masao@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH]SCSI signal(I/O) failure causes no response
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:24:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200404150524.AA03173@fukuchi.jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570442C1B2@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com>

I saw following IOC status by my test tool.
 MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_TASK_TERMINATED
 MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_IOC_TERMINATED

But for these IOC status, I saw some kind of error like another
IOC status or timeout just before(or after) the above IOC
status.

I think the SCSI_PROTOROL_ERROR has a some different meaning from
others.

Masao Fukuchi

Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
>For this particular issue, Mr Masao Fukuchi has a
>scsi bus test analyzer, in which he set the C/D signal 
>to low during read operation.  The MPT firmware
>returned MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_PROTOCAL_ERROR, which from
>the mpt manual means " An unrecoverable bus protocal error
>as terminated the SCSI I/O" and the driver will 
>return DID_RESET.
>
>Here are some of the other cases which return
>DID_RESET, however I doubt were returned with 
>Mr Masao Fukuchi's test anaylzer:
>
>MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_TASK_TERMINATED
>MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_IOC_TERMINATED
>MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_EXT_TERMINATED
>
>
>
>On Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:07, Masao Fukuchi wrote:
>> > 1.Fusion MPT driver issues read command to its firmware.
>> >   (our server has LSI53C1030 as SCSI adapter)
>> >   Then the firmware returns protocol error for the command.
>> >   Fusion MPT driver makes DID_RESET status by protocol error 
>> >   and sends it to SCSI midlayer.
>> > 
>> > 2.SCSI midlayer analyzes the status from LLD.
>> >   SCSI midlayer schedules command retry because the status is just
>> >   DID_RESET status.
>> >   (When the status has DID_RESET plus some sense code, the retry
>> >    sequence depends on the sense code. But when the status has only
>> >    DID_RESET, SCSI midlayer schedules command retry)
>> > 
>> > Sequence 1. and 2. are repeated infinitely and it causes no 
>> response.
>> > 
>> > To prevent this problem, I proposed Eric Moore to change 
>> the DID_RESET
>> > status to DID_SOFT_ERROR in fusion MPT driver.
>> > But he suggested me to change SCSI midlayer to prevent 
>> infinite loop.
>> 
>> Well, there clearly is a problem, because we can't retry no-rety
>> commands that return DID_RESET (like tape commands or fastfail).
>> 
>> However, DID_RESET is supposed to be returned for events where it was
>> determined that the command was lost because the bus or 
>> device was reset
>> (either as part of error handling or because an external entity issued
>> the reset).  Since these events, if they originate externally, can be
>> beyond the control of the device, making retryable commands subject to
>> the retry limit would be asking for unnecessary I/O errors because of
>> something we couldn't do anything about.
>> 
>> Why is the LSI driver returning DID_RESET for the problem (i.e. is it
>> some type of external bus reset, or is something else going on)?
>> 
>> James
>> 
>> 
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-15  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-14 15:56 [RFC][PATCH]SCSI signal(I/O) failure causes no response Moore, Eric Dean
2004-04-15  5:24 ` Masao Fukuchi [this message]
2004-04-23  4:44 ` Jeremy Higdon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-15 14:51 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-04-16  1:29 ` Masao Fukuchi
2004-04-14 15:23 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-04-14  1:07 Masao Fukuchi
2004-04-14 15:28 ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200404150524.AA03173@fukuchi.jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=fukuchi.masao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox