From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1/6: scsi_largelun and scsi_sparselun Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 20:18:52 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040418201852.A3393@infradead.org> References: <20040418185820.GD4868@tpkurt.garloff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:56839 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263948AbUDRTSy (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:18:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040418185820.GD4868@tpkurt.garloff.de>; from garloff@suse.de on Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:58:20PM +0200 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Kurt Garloff , Linux SCSI list , James Bottomley , Andrew Morton On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:58:20PM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote: > +static int scsi_sparselun; > +module_param_named(scsi_sparselun, scsi_sparselun, int, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(scsi_sparselun, > + "Assume sparse LUNs for all SCSI devices"); > + > +static int scsi_largelun; > +module_param_named(scsi_largelun, scsi_largelun, int, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(scsi_largelun, > + "Assume all SCSI-2 devs support more than 8 LUNs"); The names are badly chosen. On the bootline commandline they already have a scsi_mod. prefix, so the additional scsi_ is superflous.