From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patches for SCSI scanning
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:26:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040420092650.A7749@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1082471881.1804.34.camel@mulgrave>; from James.Bottomley@steeleye.com on Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:38:00AM -0500
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:38:00AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 06:54, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > Sidenote: We should drop SCSI_FORCELUN and CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN, otherwise
> > people will misconfigure their kernel (such as the HP guy) and start to want
> > every multi-lun device listed.
>
> Yes, sounds reasonable. We can do it all with the boot flags now.
max_scsi_luns should default to zero to avoid devices that should be black
listed as single lun.
So how can you remove those and maintain compatibilty? The removal should
wait for 2.7.
-- Patrick Mansfield
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-20 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-18 18:57 Patches for SCSI scanning Kurt Garloff
2004-04-18 23:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 11:54 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-20 13:02 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 16:03 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:48 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:45 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:10 ` PATCH 1/5: scsi-scan-deprecate-forcelun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:12 ` PATCH 2/5: scsi-scan-blist_replun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:30 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:03 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:13 ` PATCH 3/5: scsi-scan-no-offl-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:14 ` PATCH 4/5: scsi-scan-dont-att-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:24 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:33 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-21 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 16:08 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:55 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:51 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-22 20:39 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-22 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:58 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:16 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 14:14 ` PATCH 5/5: scsi-scan-inq-timeout Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 20:24 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:48 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 23:49 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:26 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2004-04-20 16:42 ` Patches for SCSI scanning Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 17:44 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 13:52 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 10:24 ` Fabien Salvi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-22 4:09 Martin Peschke3
2004-04-22 4:17 Martin Peschke3
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040420092650.A7749@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox