public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH 4/5: scsi-scan-dont-att-pq-notcon
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:39:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040422133912.A31488@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040421225137.GE643@tpkurt.garloff.de>; from garloff@suse.de on Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:51:37AM +0200

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:51:37AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:55:01AM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:18:30AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > There's logic to parsing data where it's needed, but it makes it
> > > difficult to locate all the places when it changes...
> > 
> > So add a macro or inline function to parse the data, like a sdev_pq(sdev),
> > then we have one location for the parsing, and don't have to duplicate the
> > data. And if sdev->inquiry changes or goes away we need only change
> > sdev_pq().
> 
> #define sdev_pg(sdev) ((sdev->inquiry[0] >> 5) & 7)
> 
> Just there is no scsi_scan.h where we could stick this.
> So either we have it at some non-obvious place or just once in
> scsi_sysfs.c. Or in scsi_scan.c and add one char to struct scsi_dev.
> I believe it's a very minor issue.

Yes, it's minor; James hasn't replied, and there aren't any other macros
like I'm suggesting, so go with the extra char.

-- Patrick Mansfield

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-22 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-18 18:57 Patches for SCSI scanning Kurt Garloff
2004-04-18 23:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 11:54   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 12:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-20 13:02       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 14:38     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 16:03       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 16:08         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:48           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:36             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:45         ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:10           ` PATCH 1/5: scsi-scan-deprecate-forcelun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:12           ` PATCH 2/5: scsi-scan-blist_replun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:14             ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:30               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:03               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:13           ` PATCH 3/5: scsi-scan-no-offl-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:14           ` PATCH 4/5: scsi-scan-dont-att-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:02             ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:24               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:33                 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-21 15:33                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 16:08                   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:18                     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:55                       ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:51                         ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-22 20:39                           ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2004-04-22 20:45                             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:58                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:16                   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:40             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 14:14           ` PATCH 5/5: scsi-scan-inq-timeout Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 20:24             ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:48               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 23:49                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:26       ` Patches for SCSI scanning Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:42         ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 17:44           ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 13:52             ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 10:24 ` Fabien Salvi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040422133912.A31488@beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=garloff@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox