From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kurt Garloff Subject: Re: [PATCH, 2.6] tmscsim - no internal command-queuing Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 01:02:33 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040520230233.GA6437@tpkurt.garloff.de> References: <20040201111726.A14042@infradead.org> <20040219151333.A24006@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:39350 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265268AbUETXCn (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 19:02:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040219151333.A24006@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 03:13:33PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Ouch. Whereas the rest are either rather intelligent things I didn't kn= ow > > about, or something I didn't want / dare to modify without a burning ne= ed, > > this is definitely just a plain simple bug - I did see it was a noop, a= nd > > I did think at some point to preserve its consistency, until I forgot > > about it:-) >=20 > Kurt, do you have any opinion on those patches? I'd love to see them goi= ng > in for 2.6.4 Please merge them. --=20 Kurt Garloff Cologne, DE=20 SUSE LINUX AG / Novell, Nuernberg, DE Director SUSE Labs --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFArTkIxmLh6hyYd04RAk5TAKDKRaNytuXn6p0RI9Uwx0dI/Qwh2wCghIHz uM45XdoLmN3Wq9Gk4M6iXPs= =3VBv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--