From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Stop megaraid trashing other i960 based devices Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:11:40 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040522171140.GA9714@infradead.org> References: <20040522154659.GA17320@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040522160205.GA8643@infradead.org> <20040522160328.GA22256@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040522160718.GA8736@infradead.org> <20040522170706.GA27386@lists.us.dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.217.7]:10762 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261682AbUEVRLn (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 13:11:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040522170706.GA27386@lists.us.dell.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Domsch Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 12:07:06PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > Now, I love a good megaraid bashing as much as the next guy. Just ask > Peter Jarrett and Atul Mukker. But in this case I have to side with > them. The cards w/o subsystem IDs all predate the existance of > subsystem IDs in the PCI spec, and I'm pretty sure the IDs in the i960 > of that vintage are hard-coded so AMI couldn't have changed them if > they wanted to. So their magic words were the equivalent of what we > now do with subsystem IDs. It's only the older cards that have a > problem, AFAIK. Okay, so let's shoot an i960 engineer instead. Intel bashing is even more fun anyway ;-)