From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: sg driver and Fedora Core 2 Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 06:41:45 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040530104145.GA3172@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <40B74725.90403@torque.net> <20040528172535.GD13961@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1085846125.2101.29.camel@mulgrave> <20040529155744.GA32621@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1085846840.2103.47.camel@mulgrave> <20040529162912.GA5922@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1085849399.2004.101.camel@mulgrave> <40B8C81E.3050106@pobox.com> <20040529172916.GD18613@suse.de> <40B9B95A.40304@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:32385 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262103AbUE3Km0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2004 06:42:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40B9B95A.40304@torque.net> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Douglas Gilbert Cc: Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik , SCSI Mailing List , James Bottomley , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 08:37:14PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > configuring the SAS domain. Expanders are SAS devices but > not SCSI devices (i.e. they are neither initiators nor > targets ***). It seems obvious that the management of a SAS > domain should be done from the user space. Only those > expanders and devices directly attached to a SAS Host Bus > Adapter should automatically be visible. Is there any reason that the SAS domain should in itself be a character device file. I've always thought of it as a network and anticipated a network layer interface for such things. That might just be my background however.