From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: CDC_RAM for lk 2.4, PATCH proposed Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:32:17 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040603183216.GX1946@suse.de> References: <1085153286.6103.24.camel@patibmrh9> <1086287419.11685.4.camel@patibmrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:39578 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263616AbUFCScY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 14:32:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1086287419.11685.4.camel@patibmrh9> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Pat LaVarre Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John McKell , Marcelo On Thu, Jun 03 2004, Pat LaVarre wrote: > Jens A: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=108509426227562 > > > > diff -Nurp linux-2.4.27-pre3/... linux-2.4.27-pre3-pel/... > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Patch looks fine to me, > > > I'll send it to Marcelo for inclusion. Thanks! > > > > Wonderful news, thank you both, consequently now with more hope I look > > forward to writing kernel patches exclusively for 2.6. > > Today 2004-6-3 I see no mention of the 5-21 CDC_RAM for lk 2.4 patch > near such strings as "Marcelo" and "Axboe" in: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/patch-2.4.27.log > > I will think go on naively believing that is the right place to poll > until someone tells me different (or we all start working 2.4.28). It was sent to Marcelo, and he even asked for a resend since he lost it. Marcelo, do you still have it or should I send it again? -- Jens Axboe