From: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Emoore@lsil.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:13:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040612051353.GA152829@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040612034518.GN24864@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 04:45:18AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:36:08PM -0700, Jeremy Higdon wrote:
> > Christoph, the midlayer gets it wrong sometimes.
>
> ... then the midlayer needs to get fixed rather than have all this code
> duplicated in a million different drivers with subtly different bugs in
> each one.
That makes sense to me. In fact, I think we could just fix it in sg.
It's only a problem with the older sg interfaces that don't specify
a direction.
To review, the problem is that many sg1 and sg2 apps don't tightly
trim the reply length. Thus, even though they're issuing a Write
command, they will set the reply length to a value greater than
SZ_SG_HEADER.
so in sg_write(), hp->dxfer_direction gets set to SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV:
if (input_size > 0)
hp->dxfer_direction = (old_hdr.reply_len > SZ_SG_HEADER) ?
SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV : SG_DXFER_TO_DEV;
else
hp->dxfer_direction = (mxsize > 0) ? SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV : SG_DXFER_NONE;
then in sg_common_write, the data direction of the SCSI request is
set to SCSI_DATA_READ:
switch (hp->dxfer_direction) {
case SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV:
case SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV:
SRpnt->sr_data_direction = SCSI_DATA_READ;
break;
case SG_DXFER_TO_DEV:
SRpnt->sr_data_direction = SCSI_DATA_WRITE;
break;
case SG_DXFER_UNKNOWN:
SRpnt->sr_data_direction = SCSI_DATA_UNKNOWN;
break;
default:
SRpnt->sr_data_direction = SCSI_DATA_NONE;
break;
}
Then when the host driver sends the Write command to the disk with the
data direction set the other way, you usually get a SCSI bus reset.
So we should probably put the direction interpretation in sg_write() near
the bottom just before calling sg_common_write().
Something like this, where sg_direction() does what the host drivers
are currently doing. I haven't actually tried this yet, but I can
code something up and give it a whirl if folks would like (I'm a little
short on time tonight :-).
===== drivers/scsi/sg.c 1.90 vs edited =====
--- 1.90/drivers/scsi/sg.c Sat May 29 10:57:23 2004
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/sg.c Fri Jun 11 22:11:20 2004
@@ -552,11 +552,6 @@
hp->cmd_len = (unsigned char) cmd_size;
hp->iovec_count = 0;
hp->mx_sb_len = 0;
- if (input_size > 0)
- hp->dxfer_direction = (old_hdr.reply_len > SZ_SG_HEADER) ?
- SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV : SG_DXFER_TO_DEV;
- else
- hp->dxfer_direction = (mxsize > 0) ? SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV : SG_DXFER_NONE;
hp->dxfer_len = mxsize;
hp->dxferp = (char __user *)buf + cmd_size;
hp->sbp = NULL;
@@ -566,6 +561,7 @@
hp->usr_ptr = NULL;
if (__copy_from_user(cmnd, buf, cmd_size))
return -EFAULT;
+ hp->dxfer_direction = sg_direction(cmnd);
k = sg_common_write(sfp, srp, cmnd, sfp->timeout, blocking);
return (k < 0) ? k : count;
}
jeremy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-12 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-31 11:52 [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-12 0:36 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-12 3:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-12 5:13 ` Jeremy Higdon [this message]
2004-06-12 5:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-15 6:08 ` [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs) Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 6:47 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-06-15 7:41 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 21:34 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 22:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 22:15 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-26 7:09 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-26 8:44 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-08-27 1:12 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-27 8:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-28 5:08 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-08-28 9:39 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-30 7:08 ` [PATCH] sg.c to warn about ambiguous data direction Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 6:54 ` [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs) Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 7:50 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 7:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 8:40 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 8:48 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 9:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 9:31 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 17:42 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040612051353.GA152829@sgi.com \
--to=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox