From: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Emoore@lsil.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:50:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040615075012.GB179379@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40CE9D31.6050606@pobox.com>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:54:41AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> This is definitely moving backwards from the direction we want to go.
You really need to look at this in the context of the original thread.
> The entity creating the SCSI command needs to specify data direction,
> _not_ tables hardcoded into the kernel. Bart recently removed such a
> table from IDE.
Yes. In this case, sg is the entity. This table causes sg to get
it right much more often than it did.
> These tables are fundamentally broken anyway, due to vendor-reserved
> commands where the data directions are not specified, but simply "known"
> by the submittor.
If the reply length is trimmed to the minimum, it will still work as
well as it does today.
> If /dev/sg's userland interface does not permit userland to provide the
> data direction, then let's just consider it broken and move to Axboe's
> bsg post-haste.
If you look at Documentation/scsi/scsi-generic.txt and then refer to
the v1 and v2 sg requests, you'll notice that you can't find a way to
specify direction. Sg tries to figure it out, but often gets it wrong.
Note that in the v3 sg interface, data direction is explicitly
specified (as it should have been originally, imho).
For those new to the thread, the idea is to remove the direction
overrides from various host drivers and centralize them in sg. If
we remove the direction overrides from the host drivers and do not
add this code to sg, then several apps that use the sg v1 and v2
interfaces will suddenly break.
jeremy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-15 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-31 11:52 [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-12 0:36 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-12 3:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-12 5:13 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-12 5:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-15 6:08 ` [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs) Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 6:47 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-06-15 7:41 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 21:34 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 22:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 22:15 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-26 7:09 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-26 8:44 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-08-27 1:12 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-27 8:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-28 5:08 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-08-28 9:39 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-30 7:08 ` [PATCH] sg.c to warn about ambiguous data direction Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 6:54 ` [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs) Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 7:50 ` Jeremy Higdon [this message]
2004-06-15 7:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 8:40 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 8:48 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 9:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 9:31 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 17:42 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040615075012.GB179379@sgi.com \
--to=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox